Skip to main content

🔬 Privacy Impact Assessment Framework

Framework Architecture​

The Healthcare Manufaktur DPIA Framework provides a structured, systematic approach to privacy impact assessment that integrates with our development lifecycle and business processes.

Framework Components​

Assessment Methodology​

Risk-Based Approach:

  • Systematic risk identification using standardized criteria
  • Quantitative risk scoring with impact and likelihood assessment
  • Residual risk evaluation after mitigation measures
  • Risk tolerance thresholds and escalation procedures
  • Continuous risk monitoring and reassessment

Privacy by Design Integration:

  • Early-stage privacy consideration integration
  • Iterative assessment throughout project phases
  • Default privacy protection implementation
  • User-centric privacy control design
  • End-to-end privacy protection lifecycle

Risk Assessment Matrix​

Impact Categories​

Data Subject Impact Levels:

  • Negligible (1): No meaningful impact on individuals
  • Low (2): Minor inconvenience or temporary concern
  • Medium (3): Moderate distress or potential discrimination
  • High (4): Significant distress, financial loss, or reputational damage
  • Severe (5): Serious harm, safety risk, or fundamental rights violation

Likelihood Assessment​

Probability Ratings:

  • Very Low (1): Less than 1% probability of occurrence
  • Low (2): 1-10% probability of occurrence
  • Medium (3): 11-50% probability of occurrence
  • High (4): 51-80% probability of occurrence
  • Very High (5): Greater than 80% probability of occurrence

Risk Score Calculation​

Risk Level Determination:

Risk Score = Impact Level × Likelihood Rating
Risk Level Thresholds:
- 1-4: Low Risk (Standard controls sufficient)
- 5-12: Medium Risk (Enhanced controls required)
- 13-20: High Risk (Comprehensive mitigation mandatory)
- 21-25: Severe Risk (Processing not permitted without supervisory consultation)

Assessment Triggers​

Automatic Trigger Conditions​

Processing Characteristics:

  • Processing involving special categories of personal data
  • Automated decision-making with legal or significant effects
  • Large-scale processing of personal data (>10,000 data subjects annually)
  • Systematic monitoring of publicly accessible areas
  • Processing of vulnerable individuals' data
  • International data transfers without adequacy decisions

Technology Indicators:

  • Implementation of new data processing technologies
  • Artificial intelligence or machine learning applications
  • Biometric data processing or recognition systems
  • Internet of Things (IoT) device deployments
  • Cloud processing service implementations
  • Data matching or profiling system deployments

Project-Specific Triggers​

Business Process Changes:

  • New product or service launches involving personal data
  • Significant changes to existing data processing activities
  • Merger, acquisition, or business restructuring activities
  • New vendor relationships with data processing components
  • Changes to data retention or deletion procedures
  • Modifications to data subject rights handling processes

Assessment Methodology​

Phase 1: Scoping and Preparation​

Scope Definition:

  • Processing activity boundaries and stakeholder identification
  • Data flow mapping and system architecture analysis
  • Legal basis assessment and documentation requirements
  • Timeline establishment and resource allocation planning
  • Risk assessment team formation and responsibility assignment

Information Gathering:

  • Technical documentation collection and analysis
  • Business process documentation review and validation
  • Existing privacy measure inventory and effectiveness assessment
  • Stakeholder interview planning and execution
  • External requirement identification and regulatory research

Phase 2: Risk Identification and Analysis​

Systematic Risk Assessment:

  • Data protection risk identification using standardized checklists
  • Privacy harm potential analysis for affected data subjects
  • Security vulnerability assessment and threat modeling
  • Compliance gap identification and regulatory risk evaluation
  • Business continuity and operational risk consideration

Impact Assessment:

  • Individual privacy impact evaluation and quantification
  • Group or community impact analysis and assessment
  • Organizational impact evaluation including reputational risk
  • Societal impact consideration for large-scale processing
  • Long-term consequence evaluation and scenario planning

Phase 3: Mitigation and Control Design​

Control Framework Development:

  • Technical safeguard specification and implementation planning
  • Organizational measure design and procedure development
  • Privacy-enhancing technology evaluation and selection
  • Data minimization strategy development and implementation
  • Transparency and control mechanism design and deployment

Implementation Planning:

  • Mitigation measure prioritization and sequencing
  • Resource requirement estimation and budget allocation
  • Implementation timeline development and milestone definition
  • Success criteria establishment and measurement planning
  • Monitoring and review procedure specification

Assessment Templates and Tools​

Screening Questionnaire Template​

DPIA Screening Assessment
Project: ________________________
Date: ____________________________
Assessor: ________________________

High-Risk Indicators:
☐ Automated decision-making affecting individuals
☐ Large-scale processing (>10,000 individuals/year)
☐ Special category data processing
☐ Publicly accessible monitoring
☐ Vulnerable individual processing
☐ New technology implementation
☐ Data matching/combining
☐ Prevents rights exercise
☐ International transfers

Risk Level Determination:
☐ 0-2 indicators: Standard processing
☐ 3-4 indicators: Enhanced assessment
☐ 5+ indicators: Full DPIA required

Detailed Assessment Template​

Section A: Processing Description

  • Processing purpose and legal basis specification
  • Personal data categories and data subject identification
  • Data flow documentation and system architecture
  • Retention period and deletion procedure specification
  • International transfer and recipient identification

Section B: Risk Assessment

  • Privacy risk identification and categorization
  • Impact assessment using quantitative scoring
  • Likelihood evaluation with supporting evidence
  • Risk score calculation and level determination
  • Residual risk assessment after proposed mitigation

Section C: Mitigation Measures

  • Technical control specification and implementation
  • Organizational measure development and deployment
  • Privacy-enhancing technology adoption and configuration
  • Monitoring and review procedure establishment
  • Contingency planning and incident response preparation

Stakeholder Engagement​

Internal Consultation​

Cross-Functional Teams:

  • IT and security teams for technical risk assessment
  • Legal team for compliance verification and advice
  • Business teams for operational impact evaluation
  • HR team for employee-related processing assessment
  • Executive team for strategic decision support

Consultation Methods:

  • Structured interviews and questionnaire completion
  • Workshop sessions for collaborative risk assessment
  • Technical review meetings for system evaluation
  • Management briefings for decision support
  • Documentation review and validation sessions

External Stakeholder Engagement​

Data Subject Consultation:

  • Representative group engagement where appropriate
  • Public consultation for large-scale monitoring systems
  • User research for product development assessment
  • Customer advisory panel involvement
  • Employee representative consultation for workplace processing

Expert Consultation:

  • Privacy law specialist engagement for complex assessments
  • Technical security expert involvement for high-risk processing
  • Industry expert consultation for innovative processing activities
  • Regulatory liaison for supervisory authority engagement
  • Independent assessor involvement for third-party validation

Quality Assurance and Validation​

Internal Review Process​

Multi-Level Review:

  • Self-assessment by project team with peer validation
  • DSO review and approval for all completed DPIAs
  • Legal team verification of compliance conclusions
  • Security team validation of technical mitigation measures
  • Executive approval for high-risk processing decisions

Review Criteria:

  • Completeness of assessment scope and methodology
  • Accuracy of risk identification and quantification
  • Appropriateness of mitigation measures and controls
  • Feasibility of implementation planning and timeline
  • Compliance with regulatory requirements and guidance

External Validation​

Independent Assessment:

  • Third-party privacy expert review for critical assessments
  • Industry peer review for innovative processing activities
  • Supervisory authority consultation for high-risk determinations
  • Certification body assessment for compliance validation
  • External audit verification of process effectiveness

Documentation and Records Management​

DPIA Documentation Package​

Core Documentation:

  • Completed DPIA assessment with all supporting analysis
  • Risk register with detailed risk descriptions and scores
  • Mitigation measure specification with implementation plans
  • Stakeholder consultation records and feedback integration
  • Decision documentation with approval and sign-off records

Supporting Materials:

  • Technical documentation and system specifications
  • Legal analysis and basis assessment documentation
  • Stakeholder consultation materials and feedback
  • Implementation evidence and effectiveness validation
  • Review and update records with change documentation

Records Retention and Access​

Retention Requirements:

  • Minimum 6-year retention for all DPIA documentation
  • Permanent retention for high-risk processing assessments
  • Secure storage with access logging and version control
  • Regular backup and disaster recovery procedure implementation
  • Systematic archival and disposal procedure compliance

Access Management:

  • Role-based access control with need-to-know principles
  • Audit logging for all document access and modifications
  • Confidentiality protection for sensitive assessment content
  • Regulatory access provision for supervisory authority requests
  • Stakeholder access provision for legitimate inquiry support

This framework ensures comprehensive, consistent privacy impact assessment while maintaining operational efficiency and regulatory compliance.

Contents