Skip to main content

⚙️ Privacy Impact Assessment Process

Process Overview​

The DPIA process is integrated into Healthcare Manufaktur's project lifecycle, ensuring privacy considerations are embedded from conception through implementation and ongoing operations.

Process Workflow​

Stage 1: Initiation and Screening (1-2 days)​

Process Trigger​

Automatic Triggers:

  • New project initiation involving personal data processing
  • Significant changes to existing processing activities
  • Implementation of new technologies or systems
  • Changes in legal basis or processing purposes
  • Third-party data processing arrangement changes

Manual Triggers:

  • Privacy team recommendation based on consultation
  • Risk assessment outcome requiring detailed evaluation
  • Stakeholder concern regarding privacy implications
  • Regulatory guidance suggesting assessment necessity
  • Executive request for privacy impact evaluation

Screening Assessment​

Initial Evaluation:

  1. Project Information Collection: Gather comprehensive project details, objectives, and scope
  2. High-Risk Indicator Assessment: Apply screening checklist to identify risk factors
  3. Threshold Determination: Assess whether full DPIA is required based on risk indicators
  4. Resource Planning: Estimate assessment requirements and allocate appropriate resources
  5. Timeline Establishment: Define assessment schedule aligned with project milestones

Screening Documentation:

DPIA Screening Record
Project ID: DSO-DPIA-2025-XXX
Project Name: [Project Name]
Date: [Assessment Date]
Assessor: [Name and Role]

Screening Results:
☐ No DPIA Required - Standard Processing
☐ Enhanced Assessment Required - Medium Risk
☐ Full DPIA Mandatory - High Risk Processing

Rationale:
[Detailed explanation of screening decision]

Next Steps:
[Specified follow-up actions and timeline]

Stage 2: Detailed Assessment (5-10 days)​

Information Gathering Phase​

Technical Analysis:

  • System architecture documentation review and validation
  • Data flow mapping with input/output identification
  • Security control inventory and effectiveness assessment
  • Integration point analysis and third-party service evaluation
  • Performance and capacity planning with privacy implications

Business Process Analysis:

  • Business requirement documentation and validation
  • Stakeholder role and responsibility identification
  • Process workflow mapping with decision points
  • Operational procedure documentation and review
  • Change management impact assessment and planning

Risk Assessment Phase​

Systematic Risk Identification:

  1. Privacy Risk Catalog Review: Apply standardized risk taxonomy to identify potential threats
  2. Context-Specific Risk Analysis: Evaluate risks specific to processing context and data subjects
  3. Threat Modeling: Analyze potential attack vectors and privacy breach scenarios
  4. Vulnerability Assessment: Identify weaknesses in proposed controls and safeguards
  5. Impact Analysis: Quantify potential harm to data subjects and organizational consequences

Risk Quantification:

Risk Assessment Matrix
Risk ID: R-001
Description: [Risk Description]
Data Subjects Affected: [Number and Categories]
Impact Level: [1-5 Scale]
Likelihood: [1-5 Scale]
Risk Score: [Impact × Likelihood]
Risk Level: [Low/Medium/High/Severe]

Mitigation Development Phase​

Control Framework Design:

  • Technical safeguard specification and implementation planning
  • Organizational measure development with role assignments
  • Privacy-enhancing technology evaluation and selection
  • Monitoring and alerting system design and configuration
  • Incident response procedure development and testing

Stage 3: Consultation and Validation (3-5 days)​

Internal Stakeholder Consultation​

Cross-Functional Review:

  • Legal Team: Compliance verification and legal risk assessment
  • IT Security: Technical control validation and security architecture review
  • Business Teams: Operational feasibility and business impact evaluation
  • Data Protection Team: Privacy framework alignment and best practice validation
  • Executive Sponsors: Strategic alignment and resource allocation approval

Consultation Methods:

  • Structured review meetings with documented outcomes
  • Written feedback collection with response integration
  • Workshop sessions for collaborative problem-solving
  • One-on-one consultations for specialized expertise
  • Consensus-building sessions for decision-making support

External Stakeholder Engagement​

Data Subject Consultation (where appropriate):

  • Representative group engagement for community-affecting processing
  • Customer advisory panel consultation for product-related processing
  • Employee representative consultation for workplace processing
  • Public consultation for large-scale monitoring or profiling activities
  • User research integration for service design validation

Stage 4: Decision and Approval (1-2 days)​

Decision Framework​

Assessment Conclusion Options:

  1. Approve Processing: Risk acceptable with proposed mitigation measures
  2. Conditional Approval: Approval contingent on additional safeguards implementation
  3. Modify Processing: Require changes to reduce privacy risks before approval
  4. Defer Decision: Request additional analysis or consultation before determination
  5. Reject Processing: Prohibit processing due to unacceptable residual risk

Approval Authority Matrix​

Risk Level           Approval Authority
Low Risk            DSO Approval
Medium Risk         DSO + Legal Team Approval
High Risk           DSO + Legal + Executive Approval
Severe Risk         Executive + Supervisory Authority Consultation

Documentation Requirements​

Decision Record:

  • Comprehensive assessment summary with key findings
  • Risk evaluation with mitigation measure specification
  • Stakeholder consultation summary with feedback integration
  • Final recommendation with supporting rationale
  • Approval decision with conditions and monitoring requirements

Stage 5: Implementation and Monitoring (Ongoing)​

Implementation Phase​

Measure Implementation:

  1. Technical Control Deployment: Implement specified security and privacy technologies
  2. Organizational Measure Establishment: Deploy policies, procedures, and training programs
  3. Monitoring System Configuration: Establish oversight and alerting capabilities
  4. Documentation Update: Maintain current records of implementation status
  5. Validation Testing: Verify effectiveness of implemented measures

Ongoing Monitoring​

Continuous Assessment:

  • Regular effectiveness review of implemented mitigation measures
  • Incident monitoring and impact assessment for privacy-related events
  • Change management integration for processing modifications
  • Performance metric tracking against established success criteria
  • Stakeholder feedback collection and integration

Review Triggers:

  • Scheduled periodic reviews (minimum annually)
  • Significant changes to processing activities or systems
  • Privacy incidents or near-misses affecting assessed processing
  • New regulatory guidance or requirement changes
  • Stakeholder concerns or feedback indicating reassessment need

Process Integration​

Project Lifecycle Integration​

Development Phase Alignment:

  • Conception: Initial screening and scoping assessment
  • Design: Detailed risk assessment and mitigation planning
  • Development: Implementation monitoring and validation
  • Testing: Effectiveness testing and validation
  • Deployment: Final approval and ongoing monitoring setup
  • Operations: Continuous monitoring and periodic reassessment

Change Management Integration​

Change Assessment Process:

  1. Change Identification: Systematic identification of processing changes
  2. Impact Assessment: Evaluation of privacy implications from proposed changes
  3. Reassessment Determination: Decision on need for full or partial DPIA update
  4. Expedited Assessment: Streamlined process for minor changes
  5. Approval Integration: Change approval contingent on privacy assessment completion

Quality Assurance​

Process Quality Controls​

Assessment Quality Metrics:

  • Completeness of risk identification against standard checklist
  • Accuracy of risk quantification using validated methodologies
  • Appropriateness of mitigation measures for identified risks
  • Stakeholder satisfaction with consultation process
  • Implementation effectiveness of recommended measures

Continuous Improvement:

  • Regular process review and refinement based on lessons learned
  • Template and tool enhancement for improved efficiency and effectiveness
  • Staff training and competency development for assessment quality
  • Benchmark comparison with industry best practices
  • Integration of regulatory feedback and guidance updates

External Validation​

Independent Oversight:

  • External privacy expert review for complex or high-risk assessments
  • Supervisory authority consultation for assessments with severe risk levels
  • Industry peer review for innovative processing activities
  • Third-party audit of DPIA process effectiveness and compliance
  • Certification maintenance for data protection management systems

This process ensures systematic, thorough privacy impact assessment while maintaining project timeline efficiency and regulatory compliance.

Contents